High Court of DelhiARB.P./376/2016

Tata Teleservices v. Jcl Teleshopping

2017-01-25Hon'Ble Dr. Justice S.Muralidhar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ ARB.P. ·375/2016 ..... Petitioner TATA TELESERVICES Through: Mr. Varrun Pandia with Ms. Shalini Prasad, Advocate versus ACHIEVERS FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through:

None + ARB.P.376/2016 TATA TELESERVICES ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Varrun Pandia with Ms. Shalini Prasad, Advocate versus JCL TELESHOPPING ..... Respondent Through:

None + ARB.P.377/2016 • TATA TELESERVICES ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Varrun Pandia with Ms. Shalini Prasad, Advocate versus SKYLOGIC TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through:

None .j/ ARB.P.379/2016 TATA TELESERVICES LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Varrun Pandia with Ms. Shalini Prasad, Advocate versus 10f2 ARB.P. 375-37712016 & 379/2016 By:AMULYA

ACHIEVERS FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through:

None CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR

ORDER

0/0 25.01.2017

1. Despite three attempts, the Respondents have not been served. All the service reports have stated either that "addressee left" or "no such firm at the given address".

2. In that view of the matter, keeping these petitions pending will not serve any purpose. The Petitioner should make an effort to ascertain the correct present addresses of the Respondents and thereafter, apply to revive the prayers in these petitions.

3. The petitions are disposed of.

S.MURALIDHAR, J JANUARY 25, 20171P 20/2 ARB.P. 375-37712016 & 37912016