Wilson v. State

$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1698/2016 WILSON ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Biswajit Kumar Patra, Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC (Criminal) with Inspector Sanjeev Kumar, PS- Kalyan Puri

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

O R D E R

% 27.05.2016 The prayer seeking a direction to the Competent Authority for parole is devoid of merits at this stage, inasmuch as, the petitioner has been released on furlough for a total of five weeks in this calendar year itself. The petition is accordingly dismissed, whilst reserving liberty to the petitioner to make a representation for parole before the Competent Authority at an appropriate stage.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J MAY 27, 2016 dn