Mohd. Yunus v. State & ORS.

$-2, 4-7 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ Cr. M. A. Nos. 14681/2015 and 14682/2015 in CRL.L.P. 570/2014 STATE Petitioner Through : Mr. Sunil Sharma, AFP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar, PS-Prashant Vihar.

Versus

BHAJAN SINGH @ GULLA & ORS Respondents Through : Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate, Mr. Anwar A. Khan, Advocate, Mr. Farooq Choudhary, Advocate and Mr. Vishal Raj Sehijpal, f Advocate.

$-4 + CRL.A. 1355/2013 Appellant Through : Mr. Mr. Shamshad, Advocate with Mr. Aditya Samaddar, Advocate.

MOHD.YUNUS versus Respondents Through : Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar, PS-Prashant Vihar.

STATE & ORS.

$-5 Crl. A. No. 1648/2013 Through : Mr. R. K. Burman, Advocate Appellant ASHOK@ BOBBY versus STATE Respondents Through : Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar, PS-Prashant Vihar.

By:AMULYA

■w $-6 Cri. A. 194/2014 BHAJAN SINGH @ GULLA Appellant Through :

Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate, Mr. Anwar A.

Khan, Advocate, Mr. Farooq Choudhary, Advocate and Mr. Vishal Raj Sehijpal, Advocate.

versus STATE Respondents Through : Mr. Sunil Sharma, APR for the State with SI Vijay Kumar, FS-Frashant Vihar.

$-7 + Crl. A. 244/2014 JOGINDER SINGH @ JAGGA Appellant Through : Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate, Mr. Anwar A. Khan, Advocate, Mr. Farooq Choudhary, Advocate and Mr. Vishal Raj Sehijpal, '

Advocate.

t versus STATE Respondents Through : Mr. Sunil Sharma, AFF for the State with SI Vijay Kumar, FS-Frashant Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

ORDER

% 26.02.2015 Cr. M. A. Nos. 14681/2015 .14682/2015 in Crl. L. P. 570/2014 The prayers made in the present applications are not opposed. Accordingly, delay is condoned.

CrL L.P. No. 570/2014 Having regard to the fact that the appeal has been filed on behalf of victim, appeals have also been filed by other respondents against the

1> judgment on conviction, it is agreed that the present leave petition may be allowed. Accordingly, present leave petition is allowed. Let appeal be registered by the registry.

Crl. A. No. 135.S/201.S In view of the fact, that the leave petition filed by the State has been allowed and appeal has been registered, it is agreed that appellant does not press his appeal and all appeals except Crl. A. No. 1355/2013 shall be heard together and learned counsel for the victim would be permitted to address arguments in connected appeals and raise grounds as available in accordance with law.

Appeal stands disposed of.

Crl. A. Nos. 1648/2013. 194/2014. 244/2014. 1355/2013 and Crl. A. No.

/ 2015 (To be numbered) Admit.

Paper book be prepared and copies be supplied to all the counsel, who are appearing in the matters.

List all appeals in Category 'A' of regular matters as we are informed that period already undergone by the appellants is almost 10 years. r f G. S. SISTANI, J.

SANGI-pADHINGftflrSEHGAL, J.

FEBRUARY 26, 2015 gr