Rame Tamang v. The State & ORS

$~1.

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 1872/2018 & CRL.M.A. 11539/2018 RAME TAMANG ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Amit Saini, Advocate with petitioner in person.

versus THE STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with SI Karamveer Singh, AHTU/ Crime Branch, SI Vipin Kumar, South East District.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 03.08.2018 The petitioner's daughter-R has been produced. We have interacted with her in chamber. She states that her parents and siblings are all living in Nepal. The petitioner was earlier working as a guard in Shimla where he was residing with his family-including his daughter-R, but now he has shifted with his family to Nepal. She states that her father has come only to rescue and pick her up and that she would be returning to Nepal with him. She states that she does not wish to live in Sanskar Ashram, Dilshad Garden or any other place, and she would like to return with the petitioner-her father.

Since R is a major and wishes to return to her native place with her

father-the petitioner, the same possibly cannot be obstructed by any authority. Accordingly, she is permitted to return with the petitioner. She may pick her belongings from Sanskar Ashram, Dilshad Garden and thereafter leave with the petitioner. No obstruction shall be caused in this process either for the petitioner or for his daughter. The petition stands disposed of in the above said terms. Dasti under the signatures of Court Master.

VIPIN SANGHI, J I.S.MEHTA, J AUGUST 03, 2018 nk