Gulshan Kumar v. Indian Overseas Bank & ORS

$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6666/2018 GULSHAN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Vinish Mittal, Advocate versus INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Gautam Singhal, Advocate for respondent No.1

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R D E R

% 03.07.2018 CM No.25809/2018 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CM No.25808/2018 This is an application by Indian Overseas Bank, making various assertions and allegations.

Without going into the same, we dispose of the application, in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner/nonapplicant that he would be arguing the appeal filed before the DRAT today. The non-applicant/petitioner would be bound by the said statement. Learned counsel for the Indian Overseas Bank would be at liberty to point out the said position and the order passed today to the Chairman, DRAT, when the appeal is taken up for hearing.

The application is disposed of.

SANJIV KHANNA, J CHANDER SHEKHAR, J JULY 03, 2018 tp