Gurmeher Swanni v. Virender Kumar Bhatnagar & ORS

$~1 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RFA 671/2018 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 32910-15/2018 GURMEHER SWANNI ..... Appellant Through:

Mr. Manish Sharma and Mr. Pranay Raj Singh, Advocates with appellant in person (Mobile No. 9810105226).

versus VIRENDER KUMAR BHATNAGAR & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Pramod Gupta and Ms. Manogya Singh, Advocates for D-1 (Mobile No. 9810083370).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 29.08.2018 1.

This appeal is disposed of with the consent order that the legal heirs of the original plaintiff no. 1, and who are now represented by respondent no. 1(a) to 1(c), will receive a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- from the appellant in full and final satisfaction of all the claims of the plaintiffs in the subject suit. It is also agreed that the suit being CS No. 18702/2016 titled as Gurmehar Swami Vs. Virender Kumar and Ors. pending in the Court of Sh. Tarun Sahrawat, ADJ-11, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, would be withdrawn unconditionally on the date fixed i.e. on 13.9.2018 by the appellant herein and who is the plaintiff in the said suit as all the disputes between the parties which are subject matter of the said suit would also be RFA 671/2018

settled and satisfied in view of the respondent nos. 1 and 2 receiving an amount of Rs.6,00,000/-. This amount of Rs.6,00,000/- has been paid in the Court today to the counsel for respondent no. 1(a) to 19(c) by means of a bank draft bearing no. 509120 drawn on ICICI Bank, Greater Kailash Branch, New Delhi, dated 28.8.2018. At the request made on behalf of respondent nos. 1(a) to 1(c) the said bank draft has been drawn in the name of respondent no. 1(b), namely, Vikram Bhatnagar. 2.

It is clarified that only the disputes between the parties to the present suit stand settled and satisfied but the respondent nos. 1(a) to 1(c) will always have liberty in accordance with law to make any claim for damages etc as against any other persons including the other co-owners or nominees of the co-owners.

3.

The appeal is accordingly disposed of in terms of the aforesaid consent order.

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J AUGUST 29, 2018 AK RFA 671/2018