Anju Gupta v. Rajiv Gupta & ORS.

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6477/2013 and CM No. 14105/2013 ANJU GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Sanjay Bhatt and Mr Abhishek Anand and Ms Vidushi Shubham, Advs.

versus RAJIV GUPTA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through: Dr. Anurag Kumar Agarwal and Mr Umesh Mishra, Advs for respondent No. 1 Mr Satyakam, Additional Standing Counsel for Government of NCT of Delhi (Respondent No.3)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 13.01.2016 After some hearing, learned counsel sought liberty to withdraw the present writ petition. He submitted that the petitioner would seek her remedies by filing an appropriate suit with respect to the signatures on the disputed documents.

Liberty granted; the petitioner is permitted to file a suit in accordance law to establish her claim vis-a-vis the contention that an affidavit was not signed by her. If the occasion so arises, the petitioner may, having regard to the outcome of the said proceedings, approach the Co-operative Society which shall then consider the matter in the light of the final order/decree passed in the civil suit.

The writ petition along with the pending application is dismissed as withdrawn, but with the above liberty.

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J DEEPA SHARMA, J JANUARY 13, 2016/bg