Atul Gupta v. Andhra Bank & ORS.

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5150/2016 ATUL GUPTA ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr.Muneesh Malhotra, Mr.Achin Mittal, Advs.

versus ANDHRA BANK & ORS.

..... Respondent Represented by:

Mr.N.P.Gaur, Adv. for R-1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 31.05.2016 CM 21394/2016 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 5150/2016 1.

We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order for the reason the property has already been auctioned and if the auction purchaser who has been put in possession of the property upon paying full consideration creates third party interest principle of lis-pendence will apply. 2.

The petition is dismissed.

3.

No costs.

CM 21393/2016 (stay) Dismissed as infructuous.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

MAY 31, 2016/'ga'