Ravinder Kumar Popli & ANR v. State & ANR

$~37 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 4340/2013 and Crl. M.A. no. 15494/2013 RAVINDER KUMAR POPLI & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Prashant Katara and Mr. Soin Khan, Advs. with petitioner no. 1 in person versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP with ASI Karam Vir, P.S. North Rohini Mr. Dikshant Khanna, Adv. with respondent no. 2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 06.02.2019 During the course of hearing, respondent no. 2 has admitted that matter was settled between her and the petitioners during the hearing of bail applications of petitioners, inasmuch as, settled amount of `25 lacs stands paid to her before the trial court but in installments. Respondent no. 2 says that petitioners delayed the payments, therefore, she may be compensated by paying `1.50 lacs by the petitioner towards the delayed payment. Respondent no. 2 submits that she will have no objection if FIR No. 97/2013 under Sections 420/34 IPC registered at Police Station North Rohini and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed on receipt of `1.50

lacs within two months.

Petitioner no. 1 is present in person and submits that he is willing to pay `1.50 lacs to respondent no. 2 within two months. Separate statements of petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2, on oath, have been recorded in this regard. Parties shall remain bound by their statements. List for payment on 22nd April, 2019.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

FEBRUARY 06, 2019 r.bararia