Harkanwar Pal Singh Lamba v. Ritesh Goel & ORS

$~6 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(OS) 2122/2010 HARKANWAR PAL SINGH LAMBA ..... Plaintiff Through:

Mr. Ajay Sahni, Advocate.

versus RITESH GOEL & ORS ..... Defendants Through:

Mr. Tushar Gupta and Ms. Nikita Barman, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 05.01.2016 1.

Counsel for the defendants states that he has instructions from the defendants that defendants are no longer using the trademark 'WELGONE'. The defendants will be bound by the statement made on their behalf by their counsel and they will not use the trademark 'WELGONE'. 2.

In view of the statement made on behalf of the defendants and which will bind the defendants, the counsel for the plaintiff states that the suit be disposed of accordingly.

3.

Suit is accordingly disposed of by injuncting the defendants from using the trademark 'WELGONE'. No other reliefs are pressed by the plaintiff.

4.

Suit is accordingly disposed of leaving parties to bear their own costs. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J JANUARY 05, 2016/ib