Babu Lal @ Pappu v. State

$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1778/2016 BABU LAL @ PAPPU ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate with Mr.

Amit Kala, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC (Criminal) with Mr. Siddharth Sindhu, Advocate and SI Jagendra Kumar, PS- Model Town

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

O R D E R

% 01.06.2016 The present is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) praying for a direction to the official respondent to release the petitioner on parole in order to enable him to arrange funds for repairing his damaged jhuggi as well as to re-establish social ties with the family and with the society. In view of the circumstance that the petitioner has been released on furlough for a period of two weeks, subsequent to the order dated 15.03.2016, rejecting his representation for parole, the present petition at this stage lacks merit.

The petition is accordingly dismissed.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J JUNE 01, 2016 dn