Amardeep Singh v. State

$~3 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1122/2016 AMARDEEP SINGH ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.D.K.Mathur, Advocate with Mr.Jaskaran Singh, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI Sanjeev, PS Vasant Vihar.

Mr.Pradeep Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 26.07.2016 1.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.1653/2015 registered under Sections 420/34 IPC at PS Vasant Vihar. Status report is on record.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties including the counsel for the complainant and have examined the file. 3.

During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions volunteered to pay `50 lacs to the complainant without prejudice and subject to future adjustment (if any). On this, the complainant has no objection to the grant of anticipatory bail.

BAIL APPLN. 1122/2016

4.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the petitioner's offer to pay `50 lacs to the complainant within ten days without prejudice and subject to future adjustment, he is granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, he be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. He shall, however, join the investigation as and when required. He shall pay `50 lacs to complainant within ten days through Investigating Officer. In case of non-compliance of the order, State/ complainant will be at liberty to approach this Court. 5.

The bail application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J JULY 26, 2016 / tr BAIL APPLN. 1122/2016