Rajeev v. The State

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RAJEEV .....Appellant Through:

Ms. Anu Narula, Advocate.

versus THE STATE .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State along with Mr. Sunil Singh Rawat, Mr.Naveen, Mr.

Arsalan Naik, Mr.Siddhartha Goyal and Ms. Swati Pandit, Advocates with SI Ramniwas, PS Uttam Nagar.

Mr. Raghav Luthra, Mr. Vinod Kumar and Ms. Shashank Sharma, Advocates for Prosecutrix/Complainant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

O R D E R

% 19.11.2025 1.

This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2.

The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant -Rajeev under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, assailing the judgment of conviction and order on sentence dated 08th July, 2008 and 11th July, 2008 respectively, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC, Rohini, Delhi, in Session Case bearing No. 236/2006 arising out of FIR No. 739/2006 registered under Sections 363/366/376 IPC at PS-Uttam Nagar. 3.

The Appellant was convicted under Sections 363/366/376 IPC. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

4.

It is submitted that the Appellant was released from the jail on 20th June, 2011 after completing the sentence awarded to him. 5.

Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that she has instructions from the Appellant to the effect that, as the Appellant has already served the entire sentence and so he does not wish to press the appeal, as the same has become infructuous.

6.

The Nominal Roll received from the concerned Jail Superintendent, is reproduced below:

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

7.

The Trial Court Record and Nominal Roll of the Appellant perused. 8.

Keeping in view the submission made on behalf of the Appellant, which is taken on record, and considering the fact that the Appellant has already served the sentence awarded by the Trial Court, the present appeal is disposed of as not pressed. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

9.

A copy of this order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent as well as to the concerned Trial Court.

RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J NOVEMBER 19, 2025 v/abk The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.