Anil Sharan Huf v. Eminent Infradevelopers Private Limited

$~CP-8 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CO. PET. 499/2016 and CA Nos. 2072-73/2016, 1328/2016 MS. SHOBHANA THAKUR & ANR.

..... Petitioners Through Mr.Chandra Shekhar Yadav and Mr.Awanish Sinha, Advs.

versus M/S ADEL LANDMARKS LTD.

..... Respondent Through Mr.Manoj K.Singh, Mr. Nilava Bandyopdhyay and Ms.Bornali Roy, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH

O R D E R

% 03.01.2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to a settlement with the respondent, his client had received some post dated cheques for Rs.17,11,464/-. These were returned unpaid. He submits that however, his client has now received Rs.13,92,886/-. Hence, the balance should be paid by the respondent as per the settlement agreed upon. Learned counsel for the respondent on instructions undertakes to make the necessary payment as per the settlement cheque amount within two months from today.

In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition.

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

In case there is any default on the part of the respondent, liberty is

granted to the petitioner to take steps as per law including revival of the present winding up petition. All pending applications also stand dismissed. JAYANT NATH, J JANUARY 03, 2018 rb