Digiana Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India & ANR

$~25 & 26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5238/2016 DIGIANA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.

..... Petitioner Through Nemo.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC.

Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda and Mr. Momin Khan, Advocates for TRAI.

Ms. Niyati Kohli and Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Advocates for TATA Sky.

Mr. Abhishek Malhotra, Advocate for IBF.

W.P.(C) 5239/2016 OM SYSTEMS ..... Petitioner Through Nemo.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC.

Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda and Mr. Momin Khan, Advocates for TRAI.

Ms. Niyati Kohli and Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Advocates for TATA Sky.

Mr. Abhishek Malhotra, Advocate for IBF.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

O R D E R

% 07.12.2017 In spite of second call, none appears for the petitioner.

As per the respondents, the writ petition has become infructuous as Digital Addressable System (DAS) has already been implemented for PhaseIII and Phase IV. Dismissed in default.

SANJIV KHANNA, J.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

DECEMBER 07, 2017 NA