Lakhbir Singh v. Arun Kumar Khanna

$~10.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EX.P. No.100/2016 LAKHBIR SINGH ..... Decree Holder Through:

Mr. I.S. Alag, Adv.

[ versus ARUN KUMAR KHANNA ..... Judgement Debtor Through:

Ms. Vanita Khanna wife of JD in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

O R D E R

% 02.03.2017 EA No.15/2017 (of the judgment debtor under Section 151 of the CPC) & EA No.16/2017 (of the judgment debtor for stay of execution under Order XXI Rule 69 of the CPC).

1.

The counsel for the decree holder states that the entire decretal amount has been received; however one of the cheques for Rs.15,00,000/- is still to be encashed. Subject to encashment of the said cheque, he states that the satisfaction of the decree may be recorded. 2.

The counsel for the decree holder also states that the right of the decree holder to apply to the Division Bench for interest, be also preserved. 3.

Mrs. Vanita Khanna wife of the judgment debtor present in person confirms but states that the decree being a consent decree, the decree holder cannot apply for interest.

4.

The Execution Petition is disposed of as satisfied with liberty to the decree holder to apply for revival if the cheque for Rs.15,00,000/- is not honoured and reserving the right aforesaid of the decree holder. EX.P. No.100/2016

5.

The counsel for the decree holder has handed over in the Court a copy of a receipt dated 1st March, 2017 executed by the decree holder and which is taken on record.

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J MARCH 02, 2017 'pp'..

EX.P. No.100/2016