Bharti Electronics v. Union Of India & ORS.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5299/2016 BHARTI ELECTRONICS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Naveen Malhotra, Advocate.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, Advocate for R-.1 Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocate for DRI in CM APPL 26726-26727/2016 Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Senior standing counsel for Customs.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R

% 27.07.2016 CM APPL No. 26727/2016 (for exemption) in WP (C) 5299/2016

1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL 26726/2016 (for modification) in WP (C) 5299/2016

2. Notice. Mr. Naveen Malhotra and Mr. Priyadarshi Manish, learned counsel, accept notice on behalf of the Non-applicants/Petitioners.

3. The prayer in this application by the Respondent/DRI is that in the order dated 13th May 2016 the words 'Additional Director, DRI' may be substituted with the words 'Adjudicating Authority'. Mr. Satish Aggarwala,

learned counsel for the Applicant/DRI assures the Court that he will, within one week from today, inform in writing to learned counsel for the Petitioners the name and designation of the Adjudicating Authority.

4. Accordingly, the order dated 13th May 2016 is modified and the words 'Additional Director, DRI' occurring therein is substituted with the words 'Adjudicating Authority'. It is now directed that the Adjudicating Authority will pass an appropriate order in terms of the said order not later than four weeks from today.

5. The application is disposed of. Order be given dasti. S.MURALIDHAR, J NAJMI WAZIRI, J JULY 27, 2016/Rm