Tavishi Bansal v. Table Tennis Federation Of India & ORS

Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

$-9, 19,20 & 21 • *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 7849/2016 and CM No. 32466/2016 SHUBH GOEL Petitioner Through:

Mr Rohit Goel,Mr Anil Goeland Mr Gaurav Singh, Advocates.

versus . TABLE TENNIS FEDERATION OF INDIA Respondent Through:

Mr Rajiv Garg,Mr SandeepBagai and Ms Neelam, Advocates.

WITH + W.P.(C) 5387/2016 ADiTYA DOBRIYAL ^ Petitioner Through:

Mr Jayant Pawar, Advocate.

versus TABLE TENNIS FEDERATION OF INDIA &ORS Respondents Through:

Mr Rajiv Garg, Mr Sandeep Bagai and Ms Neelam, Advocates.

WITH + W.P.(C) 5388/2016 TAVISHI BANSAL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr Jayant Pawar, Advocate.

versus TABLE TENNIS FEDERATION OF INDIA & ORS Respondents Through:

Mr Rajiv Garg, Mr Sandeep Bagai and Ms Neelam, Advocates.

AND + / W.P.(C) 5436/2016 TARUSHI BANSAL Petitioner Through:

Mr Jayant Pawar, Advocate.

versus TABLE TENMS FEDERATION OF INDIA (TTFI)& ORS Respondents

Through:

Mr Rajiv Garg, Mr Sandeep Bagai and Ms Neelam, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHli BAKHRU

ORDER

% 13.11.2017 1.

The learned counsel for the respondents points out that the principal grievance of the petitioners was with regard to the guidelines that were N \ issued on 23.03.2015. It is stated that now revised guidelines have been issued and a copy of the same has been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioners.

I j 2.

In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioners seek to withdraw the present petitions with liberty to file afresh, if any cause survives.

3.

The petitions and the pending application are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J NOVEMBER 13,2017 RK r