Xyz v. State NCT Of Delhi

$~11 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 1002/2017 XYZ .....Appellant Through:

Mr. Nitin Nanda, Advocate.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ....Respondent Through:

Mr. Avi Singh, ASC with Ms.Anya Singh, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 20.07.2017 1.

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C with the following prayer:- "i) Direct the production of Challan/ Chargesheet in FIR 95 of 2015, P.S. Vasant Vihar and FIR 590 of 2015 , P.S Vasant Vihar. ii) Direct the investigating Officer to act on the complaints given by the complainant regarding the threats being issued to her by Mr Anil Malhotra."

2.

The petitioner has contended in the petition that she has been threatened with dire consequences by Anil Malhotra and has been pressurized to withdraw her complaint lodged by her. 3.

Notice was issued to this petition and the status report has been filed. 4.

In the status report, it has been submitted that the investigation is being done meticulously and is at the final stage and the same will be

completed soon. The status report further revealed that the final report will be filed after obtaining the FSL report. In view of this, no further direction is called for.

5.

It is a well settled law that the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.PC is only to be exercised sparingly and the High Court should not interfere at the premature stage of investigation. 6.

As far as the threatening allegation and grant of protection is concerned, the petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate legal remedy as available to her under the law.

7.

Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J JULY 20, 2017 gr//