Mohammad Nihal v. State Of Delhi & ORS

$-31 \ +

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

W.P.(CRL) 1804/2016 MOHAMMAD NIHAL Through Petitioner Mr. Pinaki Addy with Ms. Sharda Garg, Advocates versus STATE OF DELHI & ORS Through Respondents Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Amit Singh, Mr. Shekhar Budakoti, Advocates for the State along with Inspector Satya Prakash, P.S. Subhash Place.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

ORDER

% 01.06.2016 This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner who claims to be having a live in relation with Preeti Kashyap. As per the petition, Preeti Kashyap, respondent no.4 who is a major, is being illegally detained by her father. Preeti Kashyap is present in Court. She submits that she has already left her parental home and has voluntarily decided to reside with the petitioner. The petitioner, who is present in Court, submits that he would be responsible for the well-being of Preeti Kashyap. The petitioner, accordingly, submits that that the petition has become infructuous. The petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. G.S.SISTANI, J JUNE 01,2016/pst SANGIIKADHI SEHGAL, J By:AMULYA