Amresh Kumar v. Puneet Kumar Goel & ORS

$-43 to 47 ♦

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CONT.CAS(C) 802/2016 & C.M.No.24910/2016 RAN SINGH CHAUHAN Petitioner Through Mr.Mobin Akhtar, Advocate.

versus PUNEET KUMAR GOEL&ORS Through Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr.Shubhanshu Gupta, Advocate for R-3.

+ CONT.CAS(C) 803/2016 & C.M.No.24909/2016 ^ A f.TT TAT TTDTTv Petitioner CM PRAKASH DUBEY Through Mr.Mobin Akhtar, Advocate, versus PUNEET KUMAR GOEL&ORS , Through Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr.Shubhanshu Gupta, Advocate for R-3.

+ CONT.CAS(C) 804/2016 & C.M.No.24911/2016 T^AATAirAxiT Petitioner RAMA KANT Through Mr.Mobin Akhtar, Advocate, versus PUNEET KUMAR GOEL & ORS fir Through Mr.Vinod Kumar Bhati, Advocate for GNCTD.

+ CONT.CAS(C) 807/2016 & C.M.No.24908/2016 AMRESH KUMAR Petitioner By:AMULYA

Through Mr.Mobin Akhtar, Advocate.

versus PUNEET KUMAR GOEL & ORS Respondents Through Mr.Vinod Kumar Bhati, Advocate tor GNCTD.

CONT.CAS(C) 810/2016 & C.M.No.24822/2016 BACHCHU SINGH Petitioner + Through Mr.Mobin Akhtar, Advocate.

versus PUNEET KUMAR GOEL & ORS • • • • • Respondents Through Mr.Vinod Kumar Bhati, Advocate tor GNCTD.

CORAM;

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

ORDER

o/o 18.07.2016 In view of the subsequent order of the Division Bench dated 18 May, 2016 passed in LPA No.136/2016, this Court is of the opinion that the present contempt petitions have become infructuous. Accordingly, the same are disposed of.

In the event, there is any breach of the Division Bench order, the petitioners are given liberty to file an appropriate proceeding in accordance with law.

The next date of hearing fixed in the present cases stand cancelled.

MANMOHAN, J JULY 18,2016