Manmohan Singh & ANR v. Krishanwati

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 372/2016 MANMOHAN SINGH & ANR ..... Petitioners Through : Mr.V.Shukla and Ms.Aparna, Advs.

versus KRISHANWATI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Satish Sharma, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA

O R D E R

% 13.03.2019 CM APPL No.27349/2016 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

RC.REV. 372/2016 & CM APPL Nos.27348/2016, 27350/2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits he shall not assail the impugned order provided the petitioner is given time to vacate the premises. It is agreed the petitioner shall vacate the premises on or before 28th February, 2020 on a condition the petitioner shall pay to the respondent an amount of Rs.7,500/- per month w.e.f. 01.09.2016 as user/occupation charges till vacation of the premises. The arrears be cleared by four weeks from today and future user/occupation charges be paid on or before 7th of each calendar month. The water and electricity charges be paid as per actuals. The usual undertaking to this effect shall be filed by the petitioner within four weeks from today. Any default in the payment

of user/occupation charges shall entail eviction forthwith. The petition along with pending applications stand disposed of in terms of above.

Order dasti.

YOGESH KHANNA, J.

MARCH 13, 2019 VLD