Seema v. State & ANR

$-44 & *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1601/2018 and Crl. M.A. 12509-12510/2018 REjsfU Petitioner Through: Mr. N.M. Popli, Mrs. B. Sunita Rao, Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Mr. Anurag and Mr. Varun M.

Popli, Advocates versus STATE & ORS Respondents Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Devendrera Rawat, PS Sadar Bazar BAIL APPLN. 1604/2018 and Crl. M.A. 12522-12523/2018 SEEMA Petitioner Through: Mr. N.M. Popli, Mrs. B. Sunita Rao, Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Mr. Anurag and Mr. Varun M.

Popli, Advocates versus STATE & ORS Respondents Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Devendrera Rawat, PS Sadar Bazar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

ORDER

% 13.07.2018 The names of the two applicants have figured in the complaint of Rekha Singh lodged on 11.05.2018 resulting in FIR no.91/2018 BAIL APPLN. 1601 /2018 & 1604/2018 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

being registered by police station Sadar Bazar involving offences punishable under Sections 354, 342, 427, 506, 509, 34 IPC. The incident is stated to have occurred on account of the dispute over spreading of water on the stairs. The applicants came to be engaged in verbal quarrel with Lakshmi Narain, husband of the applicant Renu and certain others intervening, the allegations of assault with the intent to outrage the modesty of women being attributable to the said Lakshmi Narain and two others.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances a case for release of the applicants Renu wife of Sh. Lakshmi Narain and Seema, daughter of Late Sh. Pyare Lai Morwal on anticipatory bail is made out.

Thus, it is directed that in the event of the applicants / petitioners being arrested, they shall be released on bail by the arresting officer on furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each with one surety in the like amount subject to the following further conditions (i) The petitioners shall continue cooperating with the investigation and join the same as and when called upon to do so; (ii) The petitioners shall not come in contact with or try to influence any of the witnesses connected to the case; (iii) Prior to their release, they shall give the telephone numbers of self and of at least one other responsible family member besides that of the surety to the investigating officer;

(iv) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any BAIL APPLN. 1601/2018 & 1604/2018

inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the, case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer Or tamper with the evidence; (v). The petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the court of cognizance or the trial court, as the case may be, and to ensure due Compliance with this condition and shall deposit his passport, if they hold one, with the said court; and (vi) This order will inure only till the date of first appearance of the petitioners in the event of a charge-sheet being filed on conclusion of the investigation and process being issued against them by the court of cognizance.

The captioned bail applications and the applications filed therewith are disposed of in above terms.

Dasti under the signatures of the CourtMaster. R K JBA, J JULY 13, 2018 Yg BAIL APPLN. 1601/2018 & 1604/2018