Rahoul Rai v. State & ANR.

\ $~56&,57- *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) I965/20I8 RAHOULRAI .....Petitioner Represented by:

Mr.Vivek Seed, Sr.Advocate with Mr.M.L.Yadav and Mr.Siddharth Gupta, Advocates versus ..... Respondents Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC for the State with SI Rakesh Kumar, PS Saket Mr.Sanjay Abott, Advocate for R-2 STATE &ANR.

Represented by :

+ W.P.(CRL) 1968/2018 Petitioners Mr.Sanjay Abott, Advocate AMIT BALIAN & ANR.

Represented by:

versus Respondents Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC for the State with SI Rakesh Kumar, PS Saket ^ Mr.Vivek Sood, Sr.Advocate with , Mr.M.L.Yadav and Mr.Siddharth Gupta, Advocates for R-2 .

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA STATE & ANR.

Represented by:

%

ORDER

09.07.2018 Crl.M.A.No. 12119/2018 in W.P.fCrI.I No. 1965/2018 Cri M.

A .No. 12 i 29/2018 in W.P.f Cri.) No. 1968/2018 Allowed subject to just exceptions.

By:AMULYA

W.P.fCrl.^ No.1965/2018 & Crl.M.A.No. 12118/2018 W.P/Crl.VNo. 1968/2018 & Crl.M.A.No. 12128/2018 By these petitions, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.461/2017 ^and FIR No.538/2017 on the ground that parties have,settled the matter. After some arguments learned courisel(s) for the petitioners seek leave to withdraw the petitions.

The petitions and the applications are dismissed as withdrawn. MUKTA GUPTA, J.

JULY 09, 2018 mamta