Mangal v. State

$~13 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.A. 1280/2014 & CRL.M.A.No.14388/14 MANGAL ..... Appellant Through :

Mr.Joginder Tuli, Advocate with Ms.Pooja Arora & Ms.Joshini Tuli, Advocates.

Ms.Arundhati Katju, Amicus curiae.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Vinod Diwakar, APP with SI Ramesh Kumar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 16.02.2016 1.

Mr.Joginder Tuli, Advocate appears and informs that the appellant has engaged him and he has filed on record the power of attorney.

2.

Ms.Arundhati Katju, Advocate appointed by the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee as amicus curiae seeks discharge as the respondent has engaged private counsel Mr.Joginder Tuli, Advocate. In view of this, Ms.Arundhati Katju, Advocate is discharged.

3.

Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, states that the appellant does not wish to pursue the appeal as he has already served out the substantive sentence awarded to him. He prays for dismissal of appeal as 'infructuous'.

CRL.A. 1280/2014

4.

Since the appellant has served out the sentence awarded by the Trial Court and does not pursue the appeal on merits, the appeal is dismissed as 'infructous'. Pending application also stands disposed of. 5.

Trial Court record (if any) be sent back immediately with the copy of the order.

6.

Intimation be sent to the Superintendent Jail. S.P.GARG, J FEBRUARY 16, 2016 / tr CRL.A. 1280/2014