Krishan @ Krishan Murari v. Govt Of NCT Delhi Through Secretary L&B Department

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6963/2018 KRISHAN @ KRISHAN MURARI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. H.N. Pandey, Adv.

versus GOVT OF NCT DELHI THROUGH: SECRETARY L&B DEPARTMENT ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L&B

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

O R D E R

% 01.08.2018 1.

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:

"It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to:

1) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or direction thereby directing the respondent, to aid the name of the petitioner in computerized seniority list for allotment of an alternative residential plot against the acquired land as per law and in case of any deficiencies of in the application by giving a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner to cure any such defects.

2) early consider the application of the petitioner for allotment of alternative plot.

3) pass any other order or relief which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents in the interest of justice."

2.

On the last date of hearing, Mr. Yeeshu Jain, learned counsel appearing for the respondent sought time to take instructions. Today he states, the writ petition shall be considered as a representation and a reasoned order shall be passed, as directed by this Court in W.P. (C) 5865/2018, Gaj Raj Singh vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi through Secretary L&B. This submission of Mr. Jain is also agreeable to the counsel for the petitioner.

Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the present writ petition as a representation and pass a reasoned and speaking order on the same within eight weeks from today. It is made clear that this direction is being given without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties.

The petitioner if still aggrieved by the order to be passed by the respondent, he shall be at liberty to seek such remedy as available in law. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J AUGUST 01, 2018/aky