Vinita Singla v. Union Of India & ORS

y.

v1:^ $-9 &

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

w.p.(C) 6010/2014 - :

y ; , / y y ^ + VIMTA SINGLA, .....Petitioner '

.\ T^pugh . Ms. Pratiksha Chaturyedi, Advocate . .V - ;

for Mr. Mahish '

• " -y v^jrsusy I y I I y • ,y'

UNION OF INDIA ^ ORS ..... Respondent '

y , Though Mr. T^shay Makhija, CGSC with „ ;

Si^dharth thakur iand Ivlr. Sanju Geeta, Advocates ' ■, ;V.iprtj6l.;

^ „y - . ' ; ■ T., Shankar, Advobate for ihteiyenef.

.. > w^p.(c); 10277/2015-> ■;

■■ ■ '7^" '

MAMTA SHLfKLA "

.....Petitioner ; -Though yN^^ ' 'y^sus-'- r,, UNION OF INDIA ,^;ORS , ■ .!... Respondent jiTlirpugh Mr. Krishan Barua, Advocate for Mr.

AJi^it Mahajan, CGSC for ubi.

^ ^ ;

■ ^ Mr, Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for R-4.

CORAMry;" - HON'BLE MR. JUpiGE SANHV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUipiCE SUNITA GUPTA

ORDER

-rrr :% 2p9;20I6 Leiatned counspi for the respondent has handed over Gazette of ■ India Notificati^on ;d|ted 3 My, 2016.. Copy thereof has been Varnished to the .leapned coimM for the; petitioner^ who seeks Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

-J i I I permission to withdraw the writ petition, -'

The writ^ petition is dismissed as Withdrawn in view of the statement made.

I ^ ^ , It i? clarified tjiat this Court has hot expressed any opinion on , merits of the case. , '

I V '

\ i - / / r SANJIV laiANNA^.

SUNITA GUPTA, J.

SEPTEMBER 29, 2016 ■NA - y■ - " ■ ' ^ ■ I'.-