Naresh Tanwani v. Shri S K Food Products & ANR.

$~12 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(COMM) 760/2016 & IA Nos.7620-7621/2016 NARESH TANWANI ..... Plaintiff Through:

Mr D. K. Yadav, Advocate.

versus SHRI S K FOOD PRODUCTS & ANR.

..... Defendants Through:

Mr Jithin M. George, Advocate for D1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 11.04.2017 1.

The learned counsel for the plaintiff states that the plaintiff and defendant no.1 have resolved their disputes in terms of the settlement agreement dated 03.02.2017 arrived at before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre (DHCMCC). He further states that defendant no.2 be deleted from the array of parties as the plaintiff does not wish to proceed against defendant no.2.

2.

The learned counsel for defendant no.1 concurs with the prayer made by the plaintiff. He further prays that the suit be decreed in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

3.

The settlement agreement has been placed on record which indicates that the plaintiff and defendant no.1 have agreed to settle the disputes in terms of paragraph 6 of the said agreement. The said agreement is lawful.

Defendant no.2 is deleted from the array of parties and the suit is decreed between plaintiff and defendant no.1 in terms of the settlement agreement dated 03.02.2017.

Let a decree sheet be drawn up.

The settlement agreement shall form part of the decree sheet. 4.

All the pending applications are disposed of. 5.

The Registry is directed to issue a certificate for refund of the court fees in favour of the plaintiff.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J APRIL 11, 2017 MK