Nitish Yadav v. State Of NCT Of Delhi
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1274/2016 NITISH YADAV ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. I.V. Raghav, Advocate.
versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Raghuvendra Verma, APP for State alongwith SI Vandana, P.S.
Bhajanpura, Delhi.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
O R D E R
% 27.06.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person having no connection with FIR No. 997/2014 u/S 376/506/323/34 IPC of Police Station Bhajanpura, Delhi. The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 1st September, 2014 however, due to ignorance, the petitioner went outside Delhi and consequently, the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide order dated 30th May, 2016 recalled the bail order. Resultantly, the petitioner apprehends his arrest by Police, Police Station Bhajanpura, Delhi.
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests that the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail till his bail application is heard by the concerned court.
On the other hand the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of State vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that the petitioner has deliberately violated the condition of bail imposed upon
him and therefore, his bail application be rejected. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is permitted to appear before the concerned court on or before 30th June, 2016 for moving the application for bail before the concerned court, who shall hear and dispose of the same on merits and in the event of his arrest before moving the application for bail in the concerned court on or before 30th June, 2016, the petitioner is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the IO/SHO concerned. The bail application stands disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
I.S. MEHTA (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 27, 2016 j