Mohd.Saeed v. The State
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1975/2018 MOHD.SAEED ..... Petitioner Through:
Mr. R. K. Narang, Advocate.
Versus
THE STATE ..... Respondent Through:
Mr. Avi Singh, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Alok Bajpai, Special Cell.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R
% 19.07.2018 The petitioner seeks parole of three months to attend to his wife, who is stated to be suffereing from anxiety disorder. According to the Status Reprot filed by the State, the doctors, who attended to his wife, are not professionally qualified to do so. The Court would take into consideration the fact that the best of medical care may not be available in the small town where his wife resides and the petitioner seeks to bring her to Delhi and to other institutions where satisfactory medical care could be given to her. The petitioner has earlier been released on parole for 13 times and has not ever misused the liberty granted. He has been in custody for 23 years, 7 months and 10 days and has earned remission of about 7 months and 4 days. According to the learned counsel for the State, the petitioner has submitted before the Jail Authorities on 01.07.2018 after having enjoyed the parole of three weeks.
Be that as it may, in view of the pressing circumstances expressed by the petitioner, the Court finds no impediment in allowing the present petition. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted parole for a period of four weeks from the date of his release on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent concerned, subject to the following conditions:- (1) The petitioner shall report to the SHO of the jurisdiction of his residence once a week on every Tuesday during the period of parole. (2) He shall furnish his telephone number to the SHO concerned, which the petitioner shall keep operational at all times (3) He shall surrender before the jail authorities at the expiry of the period of parole.
The writ petition is disposed-off in the above terms. A copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
JULY 19, 2018 sb