Manoj Kumar v. State

$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2020/2018, CRL.M.A. 12364/2018 MANOJ KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Salman Hashmi, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Purnima Malik, Advocate for Mr.

Avi Singh, ASC for State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R

% 11.07.2018 The petitioner seeks parole for filing a SLP before the Supreme Court against his conviction, to arrange funds for the same and to take care of his family consisting his aged parents, wife, a minor daughter and a minor son. His Nominal Roll shows that he has undergone imprisonment for 4 years 2 months and 6 days as of 16.06.2018 and his conduct in the jail is satisfactory. According to the Status Report filed by the respondent, the address of the petitioner has been verified.

In view of the foregoing, the Court finds no impediment in allowing the present petition. The petitioner has a right to file an SLP against his conviction and to engage counsel of his choice. Additionally, he would be the best person to interact with and brief his counsel. Hence, the petitioner is enlarged on parole for a period of one month from the date of his release, on

his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent concerned subject to the following conditions:- (1) The petitioner shall report to the SHO, concerned Police Station Palam Village, Delhi, once a week on every Tuesday during the period of parole.

(2) He shall furnish his telephone number to the SHO concerned, which the petitioner shall keep operational at all times (3) He shall not leave the territory of NCT of Delhi. (4) The petitioner shall surrender before the jail authorities at the expiry of the period of parole.

The Writ Petition is disposed-off in terms of the above. NAJMI WAZIRI, J JULY 11, 2018 RW