Amit @ Mann v. The State (N.C.T. Of Delhi)

$~3 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1303/2016 AMIT @ MANN ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr. Diwakar Chaudhary, Advocate.

Parents of petitioner in person.

versus THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through :

Mr. Kamal Kumar, APP for State with IO/SI Pankaj Kumar, P.S. Vasant Kunj (South)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 29.06.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aged about 30 years and his marriage has been arranged for 30th June, 2016. The parents of the petitioner are also present in court, who confirms the factum of marriage of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner be released on interim bail for the purpose of solemnization of his marriage and he is ready to comply any condition, if imposed upon him for this purpose.

Learned APP for State has filed the status report and has vehemently opposed the interim bail application of the petitioner on the ground that if the petitioner is released on bail, he may temper with the prosecution evidence and there is every possibility that he may abscond. I have perused the marriage card of the petitioner, which shows that the marriage of the petitioner is fixed for 1st July, 2016.

In these circumstances, the petitioner is admitted to interim bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned MM/Duty MM with the condition that he shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence and shall not leave Delhi without permission of the court concerned. Parents of the petitioner shall also give an undertaking to the above extent. The petitioner shall surrender before the concerned Jail Superintendent, Tihar within a period of 15 days of his marriage and in the event of his marriage not taking place, he shall surrender before the concerned Jail Superintendent, Tihar forthwith. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to inadvertence the name of the petitioner has been wrongly typed in the petition and for the purpose of his release on interim bail, his proper name and whereabouts be mentioned which reads as follows :

"Amit Mann @ Bhola, s/o Sh. Ran Singh, P.S. Vasant Kunj (South) Under Sections 302/120 B/34 IPC & 27/54 Arms Act". The instant bail application is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.

I.S.MEHTA (VACATION BENCH) JUNE 29, 2016 j