Sucheta Katyal v. M/S Adarsh Estate & ORS

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 333/2015 & C.M. No.6996/2015 (stay) SUCHETA KATYAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Harish Katyal, Adv.

versus M/S ADARSH ESTATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms. Ishita Yadu, Adv. for R-2 to R-5.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

O R D E R

% 15.03.2016 The impugned order is dated 12.12.2014. The application filed by the non-applicants/respondents seeking a rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC had been allowed. The plaint stood rejected. The rejection of the plaint amounts to a decree within the meaning of Section 2 (2) of the CPC. Present petition is not maintainable.

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to move appropriate petition before appropriate forum. INDERMEET KAUR, J MARCH 15, 2016