← Library
High Court of DelhiMAT.APP.(F.C.)/92/2016

Aneesh Gupta v. Deepika Gupta

2016-07-19Hon'Ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat,Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Deepa Sharma1 pages

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 92/2016 & CM No. 25095/2016 ANEESH GUPTA ..... Appellant Through:

Mr. Pardeep Kumar, Advocate.

versus DEEPIKA GUPTA ..... Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 19.07.2016 Learned counsel for the appellant urges that the impugned order dated 05.05.2016 granting custody of the child to the respondent/wife is erroneous. After some hearing, the court is of opinion that the grounds made out for intervention of essentially interim arrangement for custody are not warranted. Learned counsel urged that the respondent is not cooperating with the appellant in the implementation of the judgment vis-a-vis visitation rights. It is open in such event to appellant to seek remedy by way of appropriate proceeding before the family court as is permissible in law.

In light of this above order, learned counsel seeks liberty to withdraw the appeal.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 92/2016 is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J DEEPA SHARMA, J JULY 19, 2016/sapna