Saraswati Modern College Of Pharmacy v. Pharmacy Council Of India And ORS.

$~15 to 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 573/2018, C.M. APPL.30663/2018 HARNAM SINGH COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ..... Petitioner versus PROF B SURESH & ANR ..... Respondents + CONT.CAS(C) 575/2018, C.M. APPL.30665/2018 SARSAWATI MODERN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ..... Petitioner versus PROF B SURESH & ANR ..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 6909/2018, C.M. APPL.26199/2018 & 36803/2018 HARNAM SINGH COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ..... Petitioner versus PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 7122/2018, C.M. APPL.27105/2018 SARASWATI MODERN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ..... Petitioner versus PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 7315/2018, C.M. APPL.27898/2018 & 34091/2018 MAHENDER SINGH COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ..... Petitioner versus PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 7320/2018, C.M. APPL.27927/2018 & 34065/2018 ACS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ..... Petitioner versus PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 7363/2018, C.M. APPL.28163/2018 & 34096/2018 RBS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ..... Petitioner versus PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS.

.... Respondents Through : Sh. Sanjay Sharawat with Sh. Divyank Rana and Sh. Ashok Kumar, Advocates, for petitioner, in Item Nos. 15 to 21.

Sh. Zoheb Hossain and Sh. Piyush Goyal, Advocates, for Respondent No.1, in Item Nos. 15 to 21.

Sh. Manu Rajvanshi, for Sh. Alok Sangwan, Advocate, for Respondent No.4, in Item Nos. 15 and 16.

Sh. Abhinav Tyagi, for Sh. Anil Soni, Standing Counsel, for AICTE, in Item Nos. 17 to 21.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

O R D E R

% 06.03.2019 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that in the light of the statement made by the Union of India (UOI) before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Seth Vishambhar Nath Educational Society Thru. President & Anr. v. State of U.P. Thru. Principal Secretary, Technical Education and Ors. [Misc. Single No.15607/2018 and connected cases, decided on 03.12.2018] that the issue with respect to primacy of either of the regulatory bodies, i.e. All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) and/or the Pharmacy Council of India (PCI) is under its active consideration and due guidelines would be issued, the petitioners do not wish to press the claims in these proceedings: it is submitted that the learned counsel has instructions accordingly to withdraw the petitions. W.P.(C) 6909/2018, 7122/2018, 7315/2018, 7320/2018 & 7363/2018 and Cont. Cas (C) 573/2018 & 575/2018 are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending applications. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J PRATEEK JALAN, J MARCH 06, 2019/ajk