Ramesh Chander Sareen v. Navin Sareen & ORS

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(OS) 65/2016 & CM 31175/2016, 31177/2016, 31178/2016 Reserved on : 02nd September, 2016 Pronounced on:29th September, 2016 RAMESH CHANDER SAREEN ..... Appellant Through:

Mr.Rajender Singh advocate along with appellant in person.

versus NAVIN SAREEN & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA SANJIV KHANNA, J.

For the reasons set out in our judgment and order passed today in RFA(OS)No.38/2016, the present appeal filed by Ramesh Chander Sareen has to be dismissed. In fact, when the appeal had come for hearing, the counsel for the appellant in the present appeal had simply relied upon the arguments addressed by the appellant herein and the counsel for the appellants in RFA(OS)No.38/2016. Further, the appellant herein has not questioned and challenged the preliminary decree of partition and had only raised objections to the impleadment of Navneet Singh Anand. The appeal RFA (OS) No.65/2016

is accordingly dismissed in terms of our decision in RFA(OS)No.38/2016. There will be no order as to costs.

-sd- (SANJIV KHANNA) JUDGE -sd- (SUNITA GUPTA) JUDGE SEPTEMBER 29, 2016 ssn/VKR RFA (OS) No.65/2016