Jeet Singh v. Union Of India & ORS

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5879/2016 JEET SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr.Rakesh Dahija, Advocate.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by:

Mr.Rajesh Kumar and Mr.Abhishek Khanna, Advocates with Mr.Arvind Sharma, DC

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 13.07.2016 C.M. No.24186/2016 & CM No.24187/2016 Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 5879/2016 1.

The issue of law raised in the writ petition was decided by this Bench yesterday in W.P.(C) 5867/2016 Kailash Chander Vs. Union of India & Ors. and W.P.(C) 5871/2016 Mohan Singh Vs. Union of India & Ors. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner who was the counsel in the said two writ petitions accordingly does not press the writ petition for the reason petitioner's posting is as a consequence of petitioner's promotion. However, request is made that BSF may retain the petitioner at Delhi for two months on account of petitioner's mother having undergone surgery in one eye and surgery in the other eye to be performed in the next month or so. W.P.(C) 5879/2016

3.

While disposing of the writ petition as not pressed, we direct that upon petitioner submitting to DG, BSF necessary papers concerning his mother's continuing eye treatment, a decision would be taken sympathetically. Representation with documents shall be submitted by the petitioner in the office of DG, BSF, CGO Complex within two days. 4.

If submitted within two days, petitioner's movement order would be deferred for a period of two weeks.

5.

No costs.

6.

Copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

C.M. No. 24185/2016 Dismissed as infructuous.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

JULY 13, 2016 'hkaur'

W.P.(C) 5879/2016