Kiran v. Aarti & Another

$~14 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(OS) 2235/2013 and IA No. 18342/2013 KIRAN ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr. Vikas Sharm, Adv.

versus AARTI & ANOTHER ..... Defendants Through : None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 06.10.2015 Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that matter has been settled between the parties before the Mediation Centre on 21st March, 2014 on the terms and conditions as stipulated in the Settlement Agreement, which is marked as "Mark C-1". It is submitted that plaintiff has received the settled amount, in terms of "Mark C-1", inasmuch as has executed the Relinquishment Deed/NOC in favour of defendant nos. 1 and 2. It is submitted that plaintiff is not willing to pursue this matter any further and the same may be disposed of as not pressed. Suit is disposed of as not pressed.

Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. Since parties have settled their disputes through the process of mediation, let court

fee be refunded to the plaintiff and a necessary certificate, in this regard, be issued by the Registry to the plaintiff.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

OCTOBER 06, 2015 rb