Ifci Factors Limited v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ORS

$-^24 to 27 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C.138.^/2015&Crl. M.A.Nos>f>n80-5081/2015 IFCIFACTORSLIMITED Petitioner Through:

Mr. M.S. Vinaik,Advoeate versus STATEOF NOT OF DELHI&ORS.

Respondents Through:

Mr. KaranSingh,Advocate + CRL.M.C.1.^84/2015& Crl.M,A.Nos.5099-6000/2015 IFCIFACTORSLIMITED Petitioner Through:

Mr. M.S. Vinaik,Advocate versus STATEOF NCT OF DELHI&ORS.

Respondents Through:

Mr. KaranSingh,Advocate + CRL.M.C.l-^SS/2015& Crl. M.A.Nos.5101-5102/2015 IFCI FACTORSLIMITED Petitioner Through:

Mr. M.S. Vinaik,Advocate versus STATEOF NCT OF DELHI&ORS.

Respondents Through:

Mr. KaranSingh,Advocate + CRL.M.C. 1386/2015& Crl. M.A.Nos.5103-5104/2015 IFCI FACTORSLIMITED Petitioner • Through:

Mr. M.S. Vinaik,Advocate Crl.M.C.No.1383/2015 Crl.M.C.No.1384/2015 Crl.M.C.No.1385/2015 Crl.M.C.No.1386/2015 By:AMULYA

versus STATEOF NOT OF DELHI&ORS.

Respondents Through;

Mr. KaranSingh,Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLEMR. JUSTICESUNILGAUR

ORDER

0/„ 10.04.2015 In the abovecaptionedfourpetitions,impugnedorderdirectsreturn ofeomplaintunderSection138 of The NegotiableImtnmienteAct, 1881 tothe courtofcompetentjurisdiction.

Since quashingof impugnedorder in these petitionsis soughton identicalgrounds,therefore,these petitionershave been heard together and are beingdisposedofby this commonorder.

.At the hearing, learned counsel for petitionersubmits that the cheuqesin questionwereat par andthey canbe presentedat any locality. The aforesaidsubmissionhas been already dealt by this Court m Crl. M.C.No.700/2012,NeerajJ Shah Vs. Anr. vide orderof23 March, 2015. Adoptingthe reasoninggivenin the aforesaidorderof23 March, 2015,the abovecaptionedfourpetitionsand applicationsare dismissed. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE APRIL 10, 2015 Crl.M.C.No.1383/2015 ^ Crl.M.C.No.1384/2015 Crl.M.C.No.1385/2015 Crl.M.C.No.1386/2015