Ram Sakal @ Pappu v. State

$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2117/2018 RAM SAKAL @ PAPPU ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate.

Versus

STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Piyush Singhal for Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Additional Standing Counsel with SI P. L. Meena, P.S.

Aman Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R

% 30.07.2018 The petitioner seeks parole for a period of two months to re-establish social ties with family and society. The impugned order dated 04.06.2018 rejected the application for parole on the ground that the petitioner had recently availed furlough from 03.03.2018 to 17.03.2018. In view of the above, it will be open to the petitioner to file a fresh petition seeking a similar relief at an appropriate stage. The petition stands disposed-off in the above terms. NAJMI WAZIRI, J.

JULY 30, 2018 sb