Rajender @ Kallu v. State

$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2276/2018 RAJENDER @ KALLU ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Sharad Malhotra, Advocate (DHCLSC).

Versus

STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Nandita Rao, Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Standing Counsel for State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R

% 28.08.2018 Issue notice.

Ms. Rao, the learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the State.

The petitioner seeks parole to attend to his ailing mother, who is debilitating in her movement. His address in Delhi has been verified by the Police. His conduct in jail is stated to be satisfactory for the last one year. He has not misused his earlier parole granted for three weeks. In view of the foregoing, the Court finds no impediment in allowing the present petition. Consequently, the petitioner is enlarged on parole for a period of one month from the date of his release on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent concerned, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) The petitioner shall report to the SHO concerned, Police Station Maurya Enclave, Delhi, once a week on every Tuesday during the period of parole;

(2) he shall furnish his telephone number, which shall be kept operational at all times, to the SHO concerned, so that the police could contact him;

(3) he shall not leave the territory of NCT of Delhi; (4) the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Authorities at the expiry of the period of parole.

With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed-off. A copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties under signatures of the Court Master and a copy of this order shall also be delivered upon the Jail Superintendent concerned, through the State. NAJMI WAZIRI, J.

AUGUST 28, 2018 sb