Tanvir Singh v. State And ANR.

$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2072/2018 TANVIR SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr.Kunal Sharma and Mr.Aditya Bhardwaj, Advocates versus STATE AND ANR.

..... Respondents Represented by:

Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Ms.Jyoti Babbar, Advocate Mr.Bijay Kumar, Advocate for R-2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 13.07.2018 Crl.M.A.No.12538/2018 Allowed subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(Crl.) No.2072/2018 1.

By the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.4/2017 under Sections 279/338 IPC registered at PS Vasant Kunj (North) on the complaint of respondent No.2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that the parties have settled the matter. 2.

Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on instructions submits that in the above noted FIR the petitioner is the only accused and the respondent No.2 is the only complainant/ victim. 3.

Respondent No.2 who is present in Court and is identified by the learned counsel states that he has settled the matter with the petitioner before W.P.(CRL) 2072/2018

the Delhi Mediation Centre, Patiala House Courts on 6th June, 2018, copy whereof is annexed as Annexure-P-2 to the present petition. The petitioner has suitably compensated respondent No.2 for the injuries caused to him. In terms of the settlement respondent No.2 does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto and undertakes to abide by the terms of settlement.

4.

Petitioner who is present in Court and is identified by the learned counsel affirms the statement of respondent No.2 and undertakes to abide by the terms of settlement and be careful in future as well. 5.

In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

6.

Consequently, FIR No.4/2017 under Sections 279/338 IPC registered at PS Vasant Kunj (North) and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.

7.

Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.

8.

Petition is disposed of. Order dasti.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

JULY 13, 2018/mamta W.P.(CRL) 2072/2018