University Of Delhi v. Mata Sundari College For Wemen And ANR

$-15 to 17 & 19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8293/2011 & CMs No. 18756/2011 & 10476/2013 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Bansal and Ms. Manisha Singh, Advs.

Versus

G.G.S.C. OF COMMERCE AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rama Subba Raju, Adv. for R-1.

Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Adv. for UGC.

Mr. Anil Soni and Mr. Naginder Benipal, Advs. for UOI.

AND + W.P.(C) 8297/2011 & CMs No. 18758/2011 & 12409/2013 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Bansal and Ms. Manisha Singh, Advs.

Versus

GURU NANAK DEV KHALSA COLLEGE & ANR .... Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Soni and Mr. Naginder Benipal, Advs. for UOI.

Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Adv. for UGC.

AND + W.P.(C) 8302/2011 & CMs No. 18761/2011 & 12435/2013 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR.. Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Bansal and Ms. Manisha Singh, Advs.

Versus

SRI GURU TEGH BAHADUR KHALSA COLLEGE & ORS .... Respondents By:AMULYA

Through: Mr. Anil Soni and Mr. Naginder Benipal, Advs. for UOI.

Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Adv. for UGC.

Mr. Anil Nauriya and Ms. Sumita Hazarika, Advs. for R-2 & 4.

AND + W.P.(C) 8310/2011 & CMs No. 18774/2011 & 12408/2013 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Bansal and Ms. Manisha Singh, Advs.

Versus

MATA SUNDARI COLLEGE FOR WOMEN & ANR . .Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Soni and Mr. Naginder Benipal, Advs. for UOI.

Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Adv. for UGC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

ORDER

% 01.07.2015 1.

The counsel for the petitioner University of Delhi states that these petitions were preferred impugning the order of the National Commission of Minority Educational Institutions declaring the respondent Colleges as Minority Educational Institutions.

2.

It is further stated that the respondent Union of India (UOI) in its affidavit filed in this Court has supported the status of the respondent Colleges as Minority Educational Institutions. 3.

The counsel for the respondent University Grants Commission (UGC) also states that the respondent UGC also supports the status of the respondent Colleges as Minority Educational Institutions.

4.

The counsel for the petitioner University states that the petitioner University has taken a decision to go along with the stand of the UOI and the UGC and that he has instructions to withdraw these petitions. 5.

The counsels for the respondents have no objection. 6.

Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

[ENDLAW, J.

JULY 01 9 2015 bs