Satya Prakash v. State (N.C.T. Of Delhi)
$~47&65 .
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 1616/2018 LALIT Petitioner Through:
Mr.Rajiv Khosla, Mr.Vinay Kr.Sharma & Mr.Prince, Advs.
versus STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) Respondent Through:
Mr.Panna Lai Sharma, APP for State with SI Raj Kumar, P.S.Kapashera.
+ BAIL APPLN. 1629/2018 SATYA PIL\KASH Petitioner Through:
Mr.Rajiv Khosla, Mr.Vinay Kr.Sharma & Mr.Prince, Advs.
versus STATE (N.C.T. OF DELFII) Respondent Through:
Mr.Kamal Kr.Ghai, APP for State with SI Raj Kumar, P.S.Kapashera.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
O R D E R
% 16.07.2018 Crl. M.A. 12601/2018 (Exemption) Cri. M.A. 12627/2018 (Exemptionl Allowed, subject to ail just exceptions.
BAIL APPLN. 1616/2018 & BAIL APPLN. 1629/2018 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the petition.
Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
^ f JULY 16, 2018/rk SANJEE\(jACHDEVA, J Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.