Kavita Agarwal & ANR. v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

$-35 to 39 + CRLTMC K K AHUJA Petitioner versus STATE Respondent + CRL.M.C. 1594/2014 K K AHUJA Petitioner versus STATE &ANR Respondents • Petitioners versus STATE OF NOT OF DELHI & ANR.

Respondents SrsSwA?'

^ CRL.M.A 383/2013 Petitioner versus STATE OF NCI OF DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 489/2014 & CRL.M.A. 4066/2014 CHANDRA SHEKHAR AGARWAL Petitioner versus STATE & ANR Respondents Through: Mr Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate for petitioner in Item No.35 & 36.

Mr Ashok Kumar and Mr Vaibhav Sharma, Advocates for petitioners in Item No.37, 38 & 39 and for R-2 in Item No.35 &36.

Mr Asish Aggarwal, Addl. Standing Counsel (Crl.). with Insp. Anant Kumar, PS- S.J. Enclave.

Mr Rajesh Mahajan, Addl. Standing Counsel (Crl).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL By:AMULYA

§D

ORDER

18.01.2016 Mr Aggarwal, learned Addl. Standing Counsel (Crl.) appearing on behalf of the police states that charge-sheet in the subject FIR shall positively be filed within a period of two weeks from today.

Ordered accordingly.

In view of the foregoing learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seek leave to withdraw these petitions at this stage. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. ^ SID/)HARTH MRIDUL, J JANUARY 18, 2016 ^ mk