Gurmeet Singh @ Satpal v. State

$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2120/2018 GURMEET SINGH @ SATPAL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Madhav Khurana and Mr.

Vignaraj Pasayat, Advocates.

Versus

STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocate for Mr.

Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for State with SI Ramesh, PS-Sultan Puri.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R

% 28.09.2018 CRL.M.A. 33216/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed-off.

CRL.M.A. 33215/2018 (by petr. seeking reduction of bail bond and surety amount from Rs. 15000/- to Rs. 5000/-) The petitioner seeks reduction of surety amount from Rs. 15,000/- to Rs. 5,000/- on account of financial inability. For the reasons mentioned in the application, it is allowed. The surety stands reduced from Rs. 15,000/- to Rs. 5,000/-.

The application is disposed-off.

NAJMI WAZIRI, J.

SEPTEMBER 28, 2018/RW