Virk India v. Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi And ORS.

$~46 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 7622/2018 VIRK INDIA ..... Petitioner Through Mr Debasis Nayak, Mr Bikash Mohanty, Mr Apratim Animesh Thakur, Advocates.

versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through Ms Shobhana Takiar, Mr Udayan Khandelwal, Advocate with Mr Vinod Kumar, Section Officer.

Mr Sarfaraz Khan, Mr Mirza Amir Baig, Advocates for R2 and R3.

Mr Punit Kr Bhalla, Advocate for R5/ICICI Bank.

Mr Kailash Sharma, Advocate for R6/OBC.

Mr Rajat Katyal, Mr Ashray Behura, Advocates for R8.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 24.07.2018 1.

The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:- "Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ as it may deem fit in the present facts and circumstances, directing the Respondent no.1 to complete hearing of CCITD No. 20 of 2013 within a fixed time period."

2.

Ms Shobhana Takiar, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that the hearing in the matter had been delayed, as the incumbents had been transferred.

3.

She assures this Court that the hearing in the case would be concluded expeditiously and a final decision would be rendered within a period of three months from today. She further states that the date of the hearing will be communicated to the petitioner well in advance and once communicated, the hearing will not be adjourned.

4.

In view of the above assurances, no further orders are required to be passed in this petition. The petition is disposed of. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JULY 24, 2018 pkv