High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/2066/2016

Tito v. State

2016-07-19Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak1 pages

$~109 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2066/2016 TITO ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. R.S.Kundu, ASC for the State with SI Ramesh Kumar, P.S.Nihal Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR

O R D E R

% 03.02.2020 Crl. M.A. 2473/2020 (for marking of appearance) This is an application filed by counsel for the petitioner for marking of her appearance in the order dated 11.12.2019. It is stated by the counsel for petitioner that due to inadvertence her presence could not be marked in the said order. She prays that her presence be accordingly marked.

For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate be treated as present for the petitioner on the said date i.e 11.12.2019.

The application stands disposed of.

RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J FEBRUARY 03, 2020/ib