Babbal @ Vijender v. The State ( NCT Of Delhi)
$~104 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 1662/2018 and Crl. M.A. 12820/2018 BABBAL @ VIJENDER ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar Sharma and Mr.
Prince, Advocates versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP with ASI Shyam Sunder, PS Palam Vihar
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
O R D E R
% 18.07.2018 The name of the petitioner figures as one of the perpetrators of the offences punishable under Sections 354, 323, 452, 506, 34 IPC in FIR no.194/2018 of police station Palam Village. It appears from the status report submitted that the complainant had also alleged that the perpetrators including the petitioner had used castiest remarks to offer intentional insult but inquiry by ACP, Delhi Cantt. is stated to have concluded that such allegations about use of expressions leading to caste aspersions were not substantiated.
In the given facts and circumstances, the petitioner is allowed. It is directed that in the event of the petitioner being arrested, he shall be released on bail by the arresting officer on furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount subject to the following further conditions:- BAIL APPLN. 1662/2018
(i) The petitioner shall continue cooperating with the investigation and join the same as and when called upon to do so; (ii) The petitioner shall not come in contact with or try to influence any of the witnesses connected to the case;
(iii) Prior to his release, he shall give the telephone numbers of self and of at least one other responsible family member besides that of the surety to the investigating officer;
(iv) He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
(v).
He shall not leave India without the prior permission of the court of cognizance or the trial court, as the case may be, and to ensure due compliance with this condition and shall deposit his passport, if he holds one, with the said court; and (vi) This order will inure only till the date of first appearance of the petitioner in the event of a charge-sheet being filed on conclusion of the investigation and process being issued against him by the court of cognizance.
The bail application and the application filed therewith are disposed of accordingly.
Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. R.K.GAUBA, J JULY 18, 2018/yg BAIL APPLN. 1662/2018