Craig Alan Phillips v. Union Of India And ANR

$~40 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 6189/2016 CRAIG ALAN PHILLIPS ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Febin M. Varghes, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Surender Kukmar, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 21.07.2017 CM APPL. 25536/2017 (Exemption) 1.

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. 2.

Application stands disposed of.

CM APPL. 25535/2017 (seeking direction to the respondent no.1) 3.

The petitioner/applicant has filed the present application pointing out that the order dated 15.12.2016 has not been complied with inasmuch as the petitioner's representation has not been disposed of by a speaking order within a period of four weeks, as directed.

It is stated that almost seven months have elapsed since the petitioner made his representation to the Consulate General at Houston.

4.

Learned counsel for the respondents seeks a further period of one week and assures this Court that the representation of the petitioner will be disposed of within a period of one week.

5.

In view of the assurance given by learned counsel for the respondents,

this application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file a contempt petition in case the petitioner's representation is not disposed of by the respondents within a period of one week.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J JULY 21, 2017 nn